SVG
Commentary
Wall Street Journal

Lincoln vs. Davis Review: Clash of the Presidents

Until his choice to allow Lee to invade the North—one historian argues—Davis outfoxed the indecisive occupant of the White House.

walter_russell_mead
walter_russell_mead
Ravenel B. Curry III Distinguished Fellow in Strategy and Statesmanship
A view of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, DC. (Getty Images)
Caption
A view of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, DC. (Getty Images)

Nigel Hamilton is one of America’s least conventional and most interesting historians. His landmark, three-volume study of Franklin Roosevelt’s military leadership, “FDR at War,” offers extraordinary insights into the battles between American and British military leaders during World War II and makes a strong case that Roosevelt was a better strategist than Winston Churchill. His “American Caesars,” a series of short biographies of the American presidents from FDR to George W. Bush, provides an astonishing amount of insight and information in easily digestible form.

In his latest book, “Lincoln vs. Davis: The War of the Presidents,” Mr. Hamilton analyzes the first two years of the American Civil War. The story of America’s national epic has been recounted many times. Mr. Hamilton manages to keep his eye on the larger strategic questions even as he probes the day-to-day shifts in the military, diplomatic and political realities the two leaders scrambled to grasp. The book offers insights that will surprise even readers who know their Civil War history in depth.

Enjoyed this article? Subscribe to 91’s newsletters to stay up to date with our latest content.