Last week, Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris announced that she was opposed to the sale of U.S. Steel to Japan’s largest steelmaker, Nippon Steel. The timing was curious since it came only days after the White House signaled that it would of the $14.9 billion purchase until after the election.
The Biden-Harris administration had for months telegraphed its imminent rejection of the deal but was apparently surprised by the grassroots opposition from union steelworkers and community leaders. According to Chris Kelly, mayor of West Mifflin, Penn., the White House, which boasts of its “worker-centered” economic policies, had with workers and communities on their views of the deal.
That changed with news of President Biden’s the purchase and U.S. Steel’s that such an act would close the heavily unionized but outdated blast furnace mills, with thousands of workers losing their jobs.
Union members and local leaders expressed support for the Nippon Steel deal and how it would advance their priorities of securing jobs, producing high-quality steel, and investing in their communities. Jason Zugai, vice president of USW Local 2227, “would solidify the jobs in the Mon Valley for the next 50 to 100 years.” Braddock Borough councilwoman Chardae Jones for “not just promising investment in these plants, but investments in the people.”
Harris, while purporting to care about steel workers’ votes in states such as Pennsylvania, ignores these facts. Nevertheless, it is increasingly clear what union steelworkers want: good jobs that invest in their communities, opportunities to do high-quality work, and contribution to American industrial strength. Nippon Steel’s investments and technology will give them the tools to do so.
While chasing these priorities, American steelworkers also must contend with being at the frontlines of geopolitics due to Beijing’s aggressive use of steel dumping in its strategic competition against Washington. At a , Ranking Member Raja Krishnamoorthi noted that China overproduces its domestic steel needs by 8%. That 8% surplus is equivalent to America’s total production and, thanks to generous subsidies from Beijing, sells at prices 40% lower than American steel. In response, the increased tariffs on Chinese steel in May 2024.
Nippon Steel’s commitments would give steelworkers the tools they need to protect their jobs and their communities. The company has pledged to uphold the USW labor agreement, not to shutter or transfer U.S. Steel’s facilities overseas, and to Pittsburgh. Backing these promises are Nippon Steel’s 40-year American union steelmaking legacy at facilities such as and . These plans not only ensure job security for USW members but include investments in Pittsburgh and surrounding towns, where U.S. Steel can account for .
On top of these commitments is Nippon Steel’s to improve the quality and volume of U.S. Steel’s products. This number includes $1.4 billion of investment in USW-represented facilities, $1 billion to improve the yield, efficiency, and quality of steel from the Mon Valley Works, and $300 million to revamp the blast furnace at the Gary Works. These plans for U.S. Steel are part of to be the second-largest steelmaker in the world and “best steelmaker” by quality and capability. Its expanded capacity is a vote of confidence in the American market and a way to shield it from Chinese dumping efforts.
Transfer of Nippon Steel’s to reduce iron ore will also be crucial to making quality products. This method can already reduce carbon emissions by 33%, and the steelmaker expects to achieve 50% reductions by 2040. These advances will benefit USW members since this technology allows union-staffed blast furnace plants to compete with non-union electric arc mills on emissions and efficiency, while surpassing them with purer, higher-grade steel needed for automobiles.
Nippon Steel’s emphasis on product quality is important, considering recent studies. In December 2020, Cleveland-Cliffs – Nippon Steel’s competitor for U.S. Steel – the Weirton tinplate mill before operations in February 2024, blaming foreign competition. Yet the bipartisan that Cliffs’ customers were actually paying higher prices for foreign tinplate products because the company could not meet the desired quality or availability.
Cleveland-Cliffs’ inability to provide high-quality products is especially concerning in light of its U.S. Steel’s blast furnace mills. Given its previously uncompetitive $7.3 billion bid for U.S. Steel in 2023, its subsequent for $2.8 billion, and the $1.5 billion in it made in 2024, it is difficult to see how Cleveland-Cliffs can finance the investments U.S. Steel needs. Nippon Steel has no such concerns.
Regardless of the outcome in November, the next administration, whether led by Harris or her opponent, Donald Trump, should want what workers want: secure jobs making quality products that strengthen their communities and American industry. Nippon Steel’s investments and technology will give American steelworkers the tools to do so. Rather than talking to their labor bosses, Washington should listen to and empower steelworkers instead.
Enjoyed this article? Subscribe to 91’s newsletters to stay up to date with our latest content.