Chinese President delivery of his “four red lines” to President Biden at the 2024 APEC summit this month underscores the staggering hypocrisy and insecurity in the .
These nonnegotiables purportedly delineate areas where seeks to shield itself from external interference: , democracy and human rights, its political system and its development rights. Yet beneath the veneer of sovereign dignity lies a web of fear, contradictions and brazen disregard for global norms.
Mr. Xi’s insistence that is a “core interest” tied to sovereignty is a calculated distortion and a fallacy. status as an independent and democratic nation, formally the , predates the rise to power.
Moreover, the history of ceding vast territory to ideological allies such as the Soviet Union and exposes its selective application of sovereignty. This double standard reveals that importance to the is not rooted in territorial integrity but in ideological desperation.
is a living repudiation of Beijing’s governance. Its democratic success and economic vibrancy starkly contrast with the authoritarian stagnation on the mainland. For Mr. Xi, freedom is an existential threat — a beacon inspiring mainland citizens yearning for democracy.
By framing independence as a “red line,” Mr. Xi masks his fear of the Chinese government’s crumbling legitimacy and the erosion of his narrative of invincibility.
Mr. Xi’s demand for noninterference in democracy and human rights issues reflects the regime’s deepest fear. It is not a defense of sovereignty but an indictment of his regime’s repression. From the Tiananmen Square massacre to the silencing of Hong Kong’s pro-democracy movement and the internment of millions of Uyghurs, the record is one of systematic oppression.
Mr. Xi’s paranoia stems from a well-founded fear of his own people. The knows it governs a nation brimming with discontent, from the stifling censorship of the internet to the absence of basic freedoms. By branding democracy and human rights as foreign impositions, Mr. Xi seeks to delegitimize these universal principles, ensuring that his regime’s iron grip remains unchallenged.
This tactic, however, is failing. The world increasingly sees not as a sovereign defender but as a regime desperate to silence the voices of its own people.
Mr. Xi’s third “red line” — protecting the political system — exposes the regime’s underlying fragility. The regime thrives on control, yet its authoritarian model is crumbling under its own contradictions. Despite its propaganda, the cannot hide the growing unrest among its citizens, who resent being treated as mere state tools. The Achilles’ heel is its inability to offer legitimacy through consent. Its governance relies not on popular support but on surveillance, coercion and fear.
Mr. Xi’s demand for respect for political system is a plea for the world to turn a blind eye to these abuses. This strategy is doomed to fail as global scrutiny of the ruling 貹ٲ’s repression intensifies. From Mike Pompeo’s declaration that the does not represent the Chinese people to the steady erosion of global soft power, the authoritarianism is increasingly viewed as a relic rather than a model for the future.
Mr. Xi’s rhetoric around “development rights,” the fourth “red line,” is an Orwellian attempt to justify predatory economic practices. For decades, the government has exploited global free trade systems while refusing to abide by the same rules. Intellectual property theft, forced technology transfers and economic coercion are hallmarks of its model. Under the guise of development, seeks to entrench a planned economy within a global system it fundamentally undermines.
This hypocrisy is laid bare as nations awaken to the dangers of Beijing’s economic imperialism. From the Belt and Road Initiative’s debt traps to its blatant currency manipulation, economic strategy is increasingly viewed as a threat to global prosperity. Mr. Xi’s insistence on protecting these practices is less about development and more about preserving a system of exploitation.
There is a broader context about Xi’s four “red lines,” particularly about . They are not merely about internal affairs but represent a dangerous global dominance vision. is not an isolated target; it is the first domino in a broader campaign of territorial aggression, akin to Nazi Germany’s annexation of the Sudetenland. Mr. Xi’s alignment with Russia, Iran and underscores a chilling pattern: The Chinese government is part of a coalition seeking to dismantle the world order.
If the world permits China to conquer , it sets a precedent for unchecked aggression. The stakes are future and preserving a global system based on sovereignty, democracy and human rights.
The world cannot afford to ignore the implications of Mr. Xi’s ambitions. His “four red lines” are not the dictates of a strong leader; they are the desperate pleas of a regime afraid of its own people and the global tide of freedom.
The U.S. and its allies must reject narrative and stand firm against Chinese aggression. This is not merely about opposing overreach but about safeguarding the principles underpinning peace and prosperity worldwide.
With a new American administration poised to take a tougher stance, Mr. Xi will face his greatest challenge yet. The free world must seize this moment to expose the phoniness of Mr. Xi’s red lines and recommit to defending democracy, human rights and the sovereignty of nations. The stakes could not be higher, and failure is not an option.
Enjoyed this article? Subscribe to 91’s newsletters to stay up to date with our latest content.